AMP faces class action in Federal Court

A national plaintiff firm estimates that over two million accounts have been impacted by unreasonable fees

AMP faces class action in Federal Court

Maurice Blackburn has filed another class action against AMP, seeking redress for super fund members who are alleged to have been cheated through “unreasonable fees.”

The filing, made in Federal Court in Melbourne last week, comes after Maurice Blackburn won against four other law firms that sought to lead a separate shareholder class action against AMP.

The lawsuit stems from revelations from the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry, which found that “AMP’s superannuation funds were charging uncompetitive administration fees, with high costs exceeding returns and causing investment losses in some instances,” Maurice Blackburn said.

Most Read

The class action alleges that “AMP trustees, whose duty was to act in the best interests of members, failed to monitor, compare, negotiate or seek reductions of hefty fees being pocketed by related AMP Group companies,” the firm said.

Maurice Blackburn estimates that more than two million accounts were impacted by the alleged misconduct, said Brooke Dellavedova, principal lawyer.

AMP said that the proceeding “will be vigorously defended.”

Last month, Maurice Blackburn was given the go-ahead by New South Wales Supreme Court Chief Judge in Equity, the Hon Justice Julie Ward, to lead a separate shareholder class action against AMP. She said that the “no win, no fee” approach proposed by Maurice Blackburn was a key factor in the decision. 

Last year, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan was first to announce that it was looking at filing a shareholder class action against AMP. The suit was backed by Burford Capital.

Not long after, Phi Finney McDonald entered the fray with a lawsuit funded by IMF Bentham.

Shine Lawyers partnered with Augusta Ventures to also file a class-action suit against AMP.

Slater and Gordon also launched a class action against AMP last year with the backing of litigation funder Therium. It later consolidated its suit with the Maurice Blackburn shareholder class action, electing for the latter to solely run the litigation.

The decision to stay all but one of the shareholder class actions against AMP comes after the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia’s ruling last year on competing class actions against GetSwift. Quinn Emanuel said then that the ruling would be consequential to competing class actions in the country.

Recent articles & video

Paul Hastings enhances white-collar defense practice with litigator Renato Mariotti

Weil Gotshal & Manges expands West Coast Presence with new offices in Los Angeles and San Francisco

Lawyers seek access to Johnson & Johnson communications in talcum powder lawsuit

CRH takes major stake in Adbri with G+T's support

Pro bono commitment from NSW solicitors ticks up: report

Barry Nilsson promotes 27, brings in new principal

Most Read Articles

Clyde & Co lawyer makes move to W+K

Allens takes on JV, strategic partnership deals

Two take big roles at JWS

Head of Pearce IP's trade mark team talks protecting mascots and working with words