Law Society of England and Wales warns against lifting of all COVID-19 restrictions in court

The organisation says that a lack of safety measures could derail efforts to address backlog

Law Society of England and Wales warns against lifting of all COVID-19 restrictions in court

The Law Society of England and Wales has warned against the lifting of all COVID-19 restrictions in court following the government’s declaration that the majority of guidelines and legal restrictions across the country would be removed by Monday, reported the Law Society Gazette.

Her Majesty’s Courts & Tribunals Service had not clarified whether any safety measures would be maintained in courts, according to the publication.

“A wide spectrum of views about the ongoing COVID-19 risks need to be considered, with some people more vulnerable than others. Jurors, witnesses and professional court users need to be reassured that they will remain safe,” Law Society President I. Stephanie Boyce said in a statement published by the Gazette.

Boyce held that maintaining some safety measures would be crucial, and pointed out that the lifting of all restrictions could derail efforts to address the backlog created by lockdowns.

“There are also practical issues – if members of staff are required to self-isolate, or if a jury is lost mid-trial because of a COVID-19 contact – the removal of restrictions could become counterproductive to efforts to beat the backlogs,” she explained.

Boyce added that court capacity is not the sole factor in clearing the backlog.

“There are also challenges in finding enough part-time judges, and enough litigators and advocates to handle the volume of cases in the system,” she said.

Last week, UK Lord Chief Justice Ian Burnett confirmed the lack of resources at the Lord Mayor’s annual dinner for HM Judges.

“We have done well to limit the growth in outstanding cases. But we cannot now reduce levels as fast as we would like. Years of budgetary squeezes have reduced the resilience and flexibility of the courts and tribunals, limiting capacity. We do not currently have enough judges or staff and lack both the quantity and quality of buildings and technology necessary,” he said in a statement published by the Gazette.

Recent articles & video

Allens assists Seraya Partners with landmark acquisition of ASX lister

Law Council of Australia, ACT Bar call out underfunding in legal aid sector

NSW Law Soc, LexisNexis team up on AI Glossary

Report recommends US federal courts award monetary damages for workplace misconduct

Report highlights racial challenges faced by South Asian partners in the UK

Michael Best & Friedrich enters California market by absorbing Los Angeles law firm

Most Read Articles

Revealing the top influencers in Australia’s legal profession for 2024

HSF helps consortium wth Ulinda Park BESS project financing

Federal Court fines employer for failing to issue payslips

Lander & Rogers brings in digital economy practice head