Lawyer accuses WeWork of racial and gender discrimination

Former employee alleges company of unfairly favouring others after it reneged on the pay and title it offered while recruiting

Lawyer accuses WeWork of racial and gender discrimination

A lawyer has sued WeWork for racial and gender discrimination, accusing the company of unfairly favouring others after it reneged on the pay and title it offered while recruiting her.

Ayesha Whyte, who is an African American woman, said that WeWork promised her in 2018 a salary of US$195,000 and the title of “director of employee relations” at the start-up’s Manhattan headquarters, according to the New York Daily News.

After Whyte left her lucrative job at The Walt Disney Company and moved her family, WeWork did not give her the title, cut the promised pay by 20%, and told her she would need to move to Washington, DC, the lawyer alleges.

Most Read

What’s more, the suite said that WeWork then hired a non-African American man and gave that employee more than twice the pay for the role she was promised.

WeWork is represented by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Corporate Counsel reported. The company’s lawyers have moved to transfer the case, filed Friday at the state court of New York, to the US District Court for the Southern District of New York.

The lawyers said that the state court does not have jurisdiction over the case, since Whyte is not a New York resident, and because the damages sought exceeded US$75,000.

The suit said that Whyte was included in a workforce reduction plan, but nobody else in the employee relations department was also fired. It also alleged that WeWork tried to pressure Whyte to agree to confidential arbitration, saying repeatedly that the company would seek attorney’s fees and costs against her if she proceeded with the case in a public court.

The lawsuit also said that what happened to Whyte is not an isolated event.

“At multiple levels throughout the organization, WeWork keeps people of colour out of leadership positions and under-compensated,” the suit said.

It also said that the company had repeatedly hired less experienced Caucasians for positions in its human resources department, all while it had employees of colour who were qualified for those roles.

A WeWork spokesperson told several news organisations that the company prioritises equal employment opportunity, including hiring, promotion, and compensation. The company believes Whyte’s claims are “wholly without merit,” the spokesperson said.

Free newsletter

Subscribe to our FREE newsletter service and we’ll keep you up-to-date with the latest breaking news, cutting edge opinion, and expert analysis affecting both your business and the industry as whole.

Please enter your email address below and click on Sign Up for daily newsletters from Australasian Lawyer.

Recent articles & video

COVID-19 and Australian courts and legal bodies updates: 03 April

PwC Legal confirms role in major cross-border deal

Jones Day appoints experienced new hand to its Brisbane team

Ashurst appoints Asia-Pacific investment funds head

Top insurance lawyer joins Gilchrist Connell in Sydney

Lawyers call for review of refugees’ protection claims due to Federal Court data breach

Most Read Articles

Litigation duo swaps global firms in Melbourne

David Newman named Maddocks chief executive

Top insurance lawyer joins Gilchrist Connell in Sydney

KCL Law helps secure financing package for Australia's tallest skyscraper