Law Society updates guidance on NDAs, confidentiality agreements

Lawyers can’t contract out of professional, regulatory obligations: guidance

Law Society updates guidance on NDAs, confidentiality agreements

The New Zealand Law Society | Te Kāhui Ture o Aotearoa has announced an update to its guidance on non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements, which seeks to help its members comply with their professional and regulatory obligations when navigating such contracts. 

According to the law society’s news release, the guidance on “Non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements - lawyers’ reporting duties and suppression of professional complaints” aims to assist lawyers in understanding whether confidentiality clauses can prevent them from: 

  • reporting misconduct 
  • engaging in complaint processes 
  • fulfilling their obligations 

“This issue is not unique to New Zealand,” the refreshed guidance noted. “Overseas regulators of lawyers have also raised concerns about these types of agreements and, in some cases, issued warnings.” 

Impact on lawyers’ obligations

The guidance clarified that lawyers cannot contract out of their professional and regulatory obligations. 

“While confidentiality provisions can play an important role in resolving disputes, they should not be structured in such a way that they appear to override a lawyer’s professional obligations or could impede the progress of complaints and disciplinary processes,” stated the law society’s news release. 

The law society urged its members to consider their obligations early in the process of negotiating, drafting, or entering settlement agreements. 

The law society also encouraged lawyers to ask for advice in the event of uncertainty about the impact of a planned confidentiality clause. 

Effects of relying on non-disclosure clauses

According to the guidance, if a lawyer relies on a non-disclosure or confidentiality clause that suppresses a complaint or a mandatory reporting obligation, they might violate the following rules in the Conduct and Client Care Rules 2008: 

  • r 2.3, which prohibits the use of legal processes for an improper purpose 
  • r 5.10, which prevents a lawyer from drafting or assisting in drafting an instrument under which they benefit – except if the benefit typically attaches to acting in a professional capacity – in the absence of independent legal advice 
  • r 10.14, which prevents a lawyer from acting in a manner that hinders or obstructs the law society’s regulatory functions 

“Lawyers also have obligations to provide information as part of investigations under the LCA complaints and disciplinary framework and regulatory bodies have powers to require the provision of information,” the updated guidance stated. “A failure to comply with this may become a complaints and disciplinary matter or an offence under the LCA.” 

More news on New Zealand Law Society

Here are some other recent news stories involving the Law Society of New Zealand. 

On 10 September 2026, the New Zealand Law Society shared that it had renewed a memorandum of understanding with Te Hunga Rōia Māori o Aotearoa | The Māori Law Society. 

On 18 June 2026, the law society reminded law firms that were reporting entities under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 of the significance of their independent audit obligations, following the Department of Internal Affairs’ public formal warnings. 

Enjoy this story? Read the latest New Zealand legal news on the main page!