Institute of Architects tells lawyers to stop including them in dispute-resolution clauses

The practice places the organisation in an untenable position, it says

Institute of Architects tells lawyers to stop including them in dispute-resolution clauses

The nation’s professional organisation for architects should not be included by lawyers in dispute-resolution clauses, according to the New Zealand Institute of Architects (NZIA).

The organisation has asked the Law Society of New Zealand to notify legal professionals that the practice of including clauses in contracts that require the organisation to appoint an architect as an expert, or that the NZIA president to appoint an independent expert, is not acceptable and ineffective.

NZIA said that it has been contacted twice in June about clauses in a sale-and-purchase agreement and a lease agreement that made those requirements of the body. The organisation said that drafting those clauses into the contracts was not done with its knowledge or consent. It told the Law Society that the practice places the NZIA in an untenable position.

“It notes that the NZIA, its President, and its architect members generally, are not authorised nor have the expertise (and insurance) to provide these services,” the Law Society wrote. “The NZIA believes that any such clauses must fail for impossibility. The NZIA, its President, or its architect members cannot be obligated to provide services outside their remit or expertise.”

The NZIA also said that its own forms for consultancy agreements and construction contracts do not have similar clauses.

Recent articles & video

UK high court junks high-profile defamation case against former Tory MP

Justice Minister announces new legislation to reduce delays in the Family Court

Simpson Grierson senior solicitor: Make things happen for yourself

2023 NZ Law Awards sponsor is looking for the best in-house legal team in the country

Clifford Chance penetrates global energy hub with Houston office

Takeovers Panel welcomes Chapman Tripp partner

Most Read Articles

Why alternative career paths spell the future of BigLaw firms

Government announces plans to reform and modernise surrogacy laws

Takeovers Panel welcomes Chapman Tripp partner

Court of Appeal dismisses unjustified disadvantage claims by employee with mental health issues