Weekend Wrap: Firm launches career re-entry platform down under

Making news this week, a major law firm has partnered with an online platform to help female lawyers return to workforce, a leading commercial law firm hosted an auction to support a community legal centre and a high-profile criminal lawyer has been bought to task over false allegations.

Making news this week, a major law firm has partnered with an online platform to help female lawyers return to workforce, a leading commercial law firm hosted an auction to support a community legal centre and a high-profile criminal lawyer has been bought to task over false allegations.
 

Global law firm Herbert Smith Freehills has partnered with US platform OnRamp Fellowship to help women re-enter the workface after a career break.  This partnership marks the platform’s launch in Australia. 
 
OnRamp works by placing female lawyers into one-year, paid  fellowship placements which include continued online education.
 
“It is vitally important that we continue to find ways to access the untapped pool of female talent for roles within the firm, which complement our existing strategies to promote diversity and inclusion across the firm,” said HSF regional managing partner, Asia & Australia Sue Gilchrist.
 
Women with three years’ experience, who have had a two year or more career break, are eligible to apply for a fellowship position.
 

Gilbert + Tobin hosted the second annual art auction to raise money for the Environmental Defenders Office, ascommunity legal centres prepare to face more funding cuts.
 
The auction, hosted at the firm’s Barangaroo office, included a collection of more than 50 works from Indigenous artists across the NT.
 
Last year, the office faced imminent closure after it was stripped of funding, but painting donations saved the centre, the art fetching over $60,000 at an inaugural auction.
 

Finally, prominent Brisbane lawyer Michael Bosscher has been found guilty of “unsatisfactory professional conduct” after he tendered a report in 2012 at an inquiry which contained false allegations about chief justice Catherine Holmes.
 
His legal team defended his decision to tender the document, arguing it was already publicly available and was up to the commissioner or his team to redact the allegations or issue a non-publication order, prior to it appearing on the inquiry website.
 
However, NSW Judge Clifton Hoeben said the defamatory material was likely to diminish public confidence in the administration of justice. In his verdict, he said tendering the document was “a failure to exercise the forensic judgement called for by the circumstances”.
 

Recent articles & video

Allens assists Seraya Partners with landmark acquisition of ASX lister

Law Council of Australia, ACT Bar call out underfunding in legal aid sector

NSW Law Soc, LexisNexis team up on AI Glossary

Report recommends US federal courts award monetary damages for workplace misconduct

Report highlights racial challenges faced by South Asian partners in the UK

Michael Best & Friedrich enters California market by absorbing Los Angeles law firm

Most Read Articles

Revealing the top influencers in Australia’s legal profession for 2024

HSF helps consortium wth Ulinda Park BESS project financing

Federal Court fines employer for failing to issue payslips

Lander & Rogers brings in digital economy practice head