US Attorney General asks not to be considered for Supreme Court seat

US Attorney General Loretta Lynch has asked the White House to remove her name from consideration for the U.S. Supreme Court seat opened by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.

(Bloomberg) -- Attorney General Loretta Lynch asked the White House to remove her name from consideration for the U.S. Supreme Court seat opened by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia.

Lynch determined that "the limitations inherent in the nomination process would curtail her effectiveness in her current role," Melanie Newman, a spokeswoman for the Justice Department, said in an e-mailed statement. "Given the urgent issues before the Department of Justice, she asked not to be considered for the position."

Lynch was among those frequently mentioned by some Democrats as a potential court nominee by President Barack Obama following Scalia’s death. While selecting Lynch might have generated enthusiasm among Democratic voters in an election year, it also likely would harden resistance among Republicans in the Senate. She was confirmed by the Senate as attorney general in a 56-43 vote in April.

Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and other Republican senators have said they don’t plan to hold hearings on a nominee put forward by Obama to fill the vacancy, citing the presidential elections later this year.

Most Read

‘Deeply Grateful’

"While she is deeply grateful for the support and good wishes of all those who suggested her as a potential nominee, she is honored to serve as attorney general, and she is fully committed to carrying out the work of the Department of Justice for the remainder of her term,” Newman said.

As a career federal prosecutor, Lynch wouldn’t have a history of court decisions that could have been targeted by critics during a nomination process. But her work as attorney general could also have created some political headaches for the administration.

The attorney general recently came under fire from Silicon Valley after the Justice Department asked a judge to order Apple Inc. to help the FBI break into an iPhone used by a gunman who carried out a December shooting in San Bernardino, California. Apple and other Silicon Valley firms have said doing so would effectively create a backdoor breaking the encryption that secures their products.

Republicans also have been critical of Lynch for her department’s support of Obama’s executive action on immigration. A federal court has blocked implementation of the president’s move, which would have deferred deportation for as many as 5 million undocumented immigrants.

Some Republican lawmakers also have criticized Lynch for not appointing a special prosecutor to oversee the investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private e-mail server.

Jane Kelly, a federal appeals court judge in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, also is being vetted by the administration for a potential high court nomination, a person familiar with the process has said.

Recent articles & video

London law firm penalized for lapses in anti-money laundering training for its staff

Report reveals South Korea faces persistent gender gap in the legal profession

Promotions round beefs up Clyde & Co's Australia partnership

Piper Alderman, Holding Redlich recognised in 2025 Best Lawyers Australia

Far West Regional Law Soc roundtable focuses on access to justice

American Bar Association president Mary Smith calls for action as threats against judges surge

Most Read Articles

Nine promoted to partner at HSF's Australia branch

Brisbane BTR project kicks off with Ashurst's help

K&L Gates lures JWS M&A partner

KWM pitches in on $3.5bn raising for Kinetic