Overthrow of judicial appointment process long overdue, says expert

In light of Queensland’s scandalous appointment of the new Chief Justice, a legal expert has called for a complete overhaul of the current judicial selection process – one he calls “medieval”

Overthrow of judicial appointment process long overdue, says expert
The Australia judicial selection process should be changed to something more in line with that of the Commonwealth, says a senior lecturer at the Queensland University of Technology School of Justice.

Dr Mark Lauchs spoke to Australasian Lawyer in light of the major fallout from Queensland’s latest Chief Justice appointment.

Attorney General and Minister for Justice Jarrod Bleijie’s decision to appoint Tim Carmody QC DCJ as Chief Justice three weeks ago has spurred outcry and dissent amongst several senior judicial figures who have raised serious concerns about the suitability of Carmody, his perceived close relationship with politics, and issues with confidentiality within the selection process.  

Lauchs says the issues raised about the appointment have drawn attention to an archaic system that needs to be amended.

He says the fact that the public - which includes senior legal figures - still have no idea why Carmody was chosen, who else was considered, and whether or not he was indeed the best person for the job, reveals a broken process.

It’s highly unusual to see judges and senior judiciary speaking out so forcefully, both for and against Carmody’s appointment, and so publically, Lauchs says.

However he contends that left out of public debate has also been the reality that actually very few people want to become a judge.

Lauchs remembers a case where a judge who was near the 16th on the short list was elected due to lack of interest from the other choices.

“When someone says, ‘I know someone who would be better for the job’, we don’t really know if they wanted it…But this is about accountability. What I’m proposing is that the states adopt the process that the Commonwealth uses,” he says, adding that all considerations and recommendations need to be made public.

This updated judicial appointment process would see an independent panel of representatives including judges, those from the legal sector and community leaders create a short list of candidates for the Attorney General to choose from.

“Most changes happen because of a scandal. I’m fairly certain that [Carmody] is not going to resign, but it may be sufficient for the government to say, ‘well, we need a new system’ - It’s natural,” Lauchs says. “The process that they have used here is a system that has literally been in place since the 1200s. This is a medieval process, and we’re a democracy.”

Free newsletter

Subscribe to our FREE newsletter service and we’ll keep you up-to-date with the latest breaking news, cutting edge opinion, and expert analysis affecting both your business and the industry as whole.

Please enter your email address below and click on Sign Up for daily newsletters from Australasian Lawyer.

Recent articles & video

HSF pumps up global financial services regulatory team with new partner

DLA Piper supports nickel pig iron producer on $231m equity raising effort

US Supreme Court rejects government request that keeps inmates at high risk for COVID-19

Clayton Utz senior associate applauds greater focus on diversity and inclusion

Ashurst helps challenger bank gain unicorn status on $230m capital raising

UK lord chief justice pitches use of temporary venues for court proceedings

Most Read Articles

Cosmetics giant makes first foray into Australia with Hall & Wilcox’s assistance

KWM's chief executive partner for Australia extends run into second term

Clayton Utz senior associate applauds greater focus on diversity and inclusion

COVID-19 and Australian courts and legal bodies updates: 25 May