Japan mulls adoption of legal professional privilege

The proposed amendment to Japan’s anti-monopoly act could lead to more significant changes in the country’s legal system

Japan mulls adoption of legal professional privilege

The Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) is proposing the introduction of legal professional privilege as an amendment to the country’s anti-monopoly act, reports the Law Society Gazette.

According to the commission’s proposal, under certain conditions, investigators would not be able to access documents detailing confidential communications between a business and an attorney with respect to legal advice given in relation to unreasonable restraint of trade.

If the change is accepted, it will be the first time Japan has granted such a privilege to legal practitioners, particularly when it comes to competition laws. Historically, clients have not had a right under common law to be protected from requests for disclosure—this protection has been dependent on a lawyer maintaining confidentiality in accordance with duty. Thus far, Japan has been one of just three jurisdictions under the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development to fail to recognise attorney-client privilege.

Thus, introducing legal professional privilege could result in significant changes to the country’s legal system down the line.

At present, the JFTC is calling for stakeholders like the Law Society and the International Bar Association to provide their views on the proposal.

“Protecting communications between lawyers and their clients not only strengthens access to justice; it ultimately enhances the rule of law and compliance by both individual and business clients. The Law Society therefore welcomes this important consultation,” said Law Society President Simon Davis.

In 2019, a bill was passed in to modify the country’s anti-monopoly act in a move to boost consumer interests as well as the economy. Other suggested changes to the act include the implementation of a system in which a business can reduce surcharges by cooperating with investigators.

Meanwhile, significant criminal fines would be imposed on companies who obstruct an investigation.

The JFTC proposed these amendments in a landmark public fair-trade consultation that is set to close on 15 May.

Recent articles & video

Allens assists Seraya Partners with landmark acquisition of ASX lister

Law Council of Australia, ACT Bar call out underfunding in legal aid sector

NSW Law Soc, LexisNexis team up on AI Glossary

Report recommends US federal courts award monetary damages for workplace misconduct

Report highlights racial challenges faced by South Asian partners in the UK

Michael Best & Friedrich enters California market by absorbing Los Angeles law firm

Most Read Articles

Revealing the top influencers in Australia’s legal profession for 2024

HSF helps consortium wth Ulinda Park BESS project financing

Federal Court fines employer for failing to issue payslips

Lander & Rogers brings in digital economy practice head