Contract lawyers have become ‘copy and paste monkeys’ – law professor

The criticism was lobbed by an American lawyer in a panel discussing how to improve contract drafting.

Contract lawyers have become ‘copy and paste monkeys’ – law professor
Contract drafting has become so flawed that lawyers drafting contracts have become “copy and paste monkeys,” an American lawyer said.
The comment came from Ken Adams, adjunct professor at Notre Dame Law School in Indiana at a panel on how to improve contract drafting hosted by the University College London last week, according to The Law Society Gazette.
The US-based lawyer suggested that a universal contract drafting style guide should be developed and used by law firms and that automated templates put together by answering a series of questions should be considered.
Fellow panellist and Clifford Chance partner Kate Gibbons said, however, that there is no “one size fits all” template and that templates in general should not be “slavishly followed.” The Magic Circle firm partner said that lawyers can improve by reading and studying poetry because it develops appreciation of “the importance of every word.”
Gibbons – along with fellow panellists Kristin McFetridge, chief counsel for BT, and High Court judge Justice Flaux – also criticised excessively complex language in contract drafting, the Gazette said.
McFetridge said that BT has already reworked its terms and conditions so “customers understand exactly what they are buying.” To improve, lawyers can try studying a foreign language as this could help them better understand the “quirks of the English language.”
Justice Flaux, meanwhile, suggested provisions and interpretations that are “tried and tested” should be used but added that a problems is many people “do not appear to understand grammar.”
“Ensuring you properly understand the meaning of what you are writing is crucial, as incorrectly used grammar can change the meaning,” the judge said.
However, Adams said he cannot accept the notion of tried and tested. He noted that 93% of interpretation clauses either state the obvious or are not feasible, the Gazette wrote.

Related stories:
Build your contract law knowledge in 2017
Aussie firm launches AI joint venture

Free newsletter

Subscribe to our FREE newsletter service and we’ll keep you up-to-date with the latest breaking news, cutting edge opinion, and expert analysis affecting both your business and the industry as whole.

Please enter your email address below and click on Sign Up for daily newsletters from Australasian Lawyer.

Recent articles & video

Australian law firms to set new working parameters

Final week to find the legal profession’s emerging leaders

Partner at major firm defends destroying notes after internal bullying investigation

Major legal consultancy in the UK appoints new managing director

Lawyers need to acknowledge their value, EY Law partner says

Boutique firm’s practice director among Global Banking Regulation Review’s 45 under 45

Most Read Articles

HWL in shock IPO decision

Risk advisory head tapped as NRF's next Australia chair

MinterEllison acts on $446m sale of cancer treatment facility

Lawyers need to acknowledge their value, EY Law partner says