Australian whistle-blower laws ‘completely inadequate’

The comment comes after the Victorian Supreme Court quashed a proposed shareholder class action.

Australian whistle-blower laws ‘completely inadequate’
Maurice Blackburn has called for a change to the whistle-blower laws of Australia which it describes as extremely inadequate.
 
The law firm’s comment comes after the Victorian Supreme Court quashed a proposed shareholder class action against listed financial services company IOOF.
 
IOOF and Maurice Blackburn have both agreed to walk away without costs, the law firm said.
 
The law firm announced a class action on behalf tens of thousands of the financial firm’s shareholders who suffered losses after the company’s price slid after the publication of whistle-blower-sourced documents in The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald last year.
 
Maurice Blackburn Principal Jacob Varghese said the case exemplifies why whistle-blower laws of the country need to be revisited.
 
“We have long argued that whistle-blower laws in this country are completely inadequate, and this legal process has made that point very clearly,” Varghese said.
 
“We need parliaments to codify the law to make it clear that there is nothing wrong with whistle-blowers communicating with class action lawyers acting for the victims of corporate misconduct. Without such change, it is too easy for corporate wrongdoers to tie up class actions in expensive satellite litigation and avoid accountability. That is what happened here,” he noted.
 
After the Supreme Court’s order, IOOF reiterated that they believed the proposed class action was “misconceived both factually and at law.”
 
Varghese had choice words for the financial services firm.
 
“The fact that IOOF sued Maurice Blackburn and no one else shows that this case was motivated for the sole purpose of stopping our firm from holding IOOF to account on behalf of shareholders,” Varghese said.
 
“We still firmly believe IOOF did the wrong thing and should be held to account and that the reason it fought so hard was to avoid the scrutiny a class action would bring.
 
“When laws do more to protect the wrongdoer than the people trying to expose misconduct and bring justice to its victims, something is amiss and it needs to change.”
 

Related stories:
Supreme Court action against law firm dismissed
Ex-Maurice Blackburn lawyers launch national firm first
 

Free newsletter

Subscribe to our FREE newsletter service and we’ll keep you up-to-date with the latest breaking news, cutting edge opinion, and expert analysis affecting both your business and the industry as whole.

Please enter your email address below and click on Sign Up for daily newsletters from Australasian Lawyer.

Recent articles & video

Clayton Utz guides aerial imagery company to picture-perfect sale

IBAHRI blasts Samoan government’s proposed legislation

KWM's chief executive partner for Australia extends run into second term

COVID-19 and Australian courts and legal bodies updates: 25 May

Cosmetics giant makes first foray into Australia with Hall & Wilcox’s assistance

Legal services regulation review not on UK Ministry of Justice’s agenda

Most Read Articles

HSF advises bank on $3.3bn sale of ownership stakes

KWM's chief executive partner for Australia extends run into second term

Cosmetics giant makes first foray into Australia with Hall & Wilcox’s assistance

$285m retail sale is a success with MinterEllison’s help