ACT Law Soc, ACT Bar Association support indicative sentencing reform

Joint submission has recommendations about prosecutorial consent, family violence

ACT Law Soc, ACT Bar Association support indicative sentencing reform

In a joint submission to the inquiry into the Magistrates Court (Indicative Sentencing) Amendment Bill 2025, the ACT Law Society and the ACT Bar Association commended the ACT government for leading progress in indicative sentencing reforms. 

In a media release, the law society noted that it has long supported introducing an indicative sentencing framework in the ACT. 

The joint submission of the organisations acknowledged the potential of reforms to promote accountability, encourage early guilty pleas, relieve emotional burden, decrease court delays, and improve the overall efficiency of the criminal justice system. 

However, the joint submission pointed out that some parts of the legislation’s current version might limit its benefits and result in needless complexity and unfairness. 

The ACT-based organisations recommended that the legislature: 

  • Delete the prosecutorial consent requirement, given that the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) veto power may undermine judicial independence and efficiency 
  • Include family violence cases in indicative sentencing, which may encourage accountability, shorten court time, and avoid cross-examination where possible 
  • Clarify the victim impact statement requirement to reflect that it is not a precondition for indicative sentencing and that the court should consider it only if submitted 
  • Repeal the restriction on sentence discounts in s 35(4) of the Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005, which may negate early guilty plea incentives 
  • Permit the withdrawal of guilty pleas if the prosecution successfully appeals a sentence flowing from the indicative sentencing process 

The joint submission explained that the lack of a provision allowing such withdrawal in that situation may undermine the scheme by securing a plea based on a ‘false premise.’ 

More on joint submission

The ACT Law Society and the ACT Bar Association developed the joint submission with contributions from both of their criminal law committees. The organisations expressed gratitude to the committees’ members for their insights. 

The organisations shared that they planned to maintain their advocacy for preserving judicial discretion to affirm the separation of powers and promote proportional sentencing. 

“We’re committed to keeping members informed about our policy and advocacy work,” the law society said in its media release

The law society thanked the bar association for partnering with it to prepare the joint submission, which is available on the ACT Legislative Assembly’s inquiry page.