IBA’s Human Rights Institute condemns new government plan to curb powers of the Supreme Court

Over 80,000 Israeli protesters have demonstrated against the proposed changes

IBA’s Human Rights Institute condemns new government plan to curb powers of the Supreme Court

The International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute has condemned a decision by Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to introduce legislation which will enable the Israeli Parliament to overthrow decisions of the country’s Supreme Court.

 “The IBAHRI strongly objects to these plans, which constitute an affront to the rule of law and its foundational principle that the judiciary is independent of the government and decisions from the courts are respected by Parliament,” said IBAHRI co-chair and immediate past secretary general of the Swedish Bar Association, Anne Ramberg. “This is a troubling departure from democratic norms, and we urge Mr Netanyahu and his cabinet to reverse this decision.”

Under plans announced by Justice Minister Yariv Levin in early January 2023, a simple majority in the Knesset (the legislative branch of the Israeli government) would have the sweeping power to annul Supreme Court decisions that strike down legislation found to be unconstitutional and give the government and its allies control over the appointment of judges. Aharon Barak, former president of the Supreme Court of Israel from 1995 to 2006  compared the plans to the attacks on judicial independence carried out by authoritarian governments in Hungary, Poland and Turkey, and warned that the proposed changes were “fertiliser that will lead to the growth of tyranny of the majority.”

Most Read

“This plan crosses the democratic Rubicon and must not be allowed to stand. These proposals not only challenge the authority of Israel’s courts, but the very bedrock of the country’s democratic system and its constitutional commitment to the rule of law,” said  IBAHRI co-chair Mark Stephens.

Over 80,000 Israeli protesters have demonstrated against the proposed changes, with critics of the government’s plan arguing that the reforms would cripple judicial independence, foster corruption, set back Palestinian rights, deprive the country’s court system of credibility, and make it easier for the government to legislate in favour of Jewish settlements in the Occupied West Bank.

Recent articles & video

Three join the District Court bench

DLA Piper coaches Aquila Clean Energy APAC, solar farm on Westpac NZ deal

Kate Sheppard Chambers takes on three

Lane Neave moves Wellington premises to Customhouse Quay

High Court dismisses appeal in trademark dispute between churches over confusingly similar names

Senior lawyers step up at AJ Park

Most Read Articles

Three join the District Court bench

Lane Neave moves Wellington premises to Customhouse Quay

Simpson Western snaps up solicitor from Chapman Tripp

The most popular trade mark opposition and invalidity grounds pleaded in New Zealand