Firm’s partners see profits jump 15%

The spike sees partners earn nearly US$1m in 2016

Firm’s partners see profits jump 15%
Squire Patton Boggs had a banner year in 2016, with profits per partner jumping 15% to nearly $1m off the back of a 6% increase in the firm’s top line.

Last year, the firm earned US$983m, up US$54m. Revenue per lawyer rose 3% to $670,000, while profits per partner increased to US$975m.

“We have spent the past several years making investments aimed at building a platform that helps our lawyers deliver results for clients, and also attracts new clients and talent to the firm,” said global managing partner Steve Mahon. “We are seeing those investments pay off.”

He said in a statement that contributing to the growth were the firm’s cross-border compliance, regulatory, transactional, and litigation practices.

Squire Patton Boggs, formed three years ago by the merger of Squire Sanders and Patton Boggs, saw lawyer headcount grow to 1,466 worldwide last year, an addition of 40 lawyers. It had 172 equity partners, up by 26. Non-equity partners dwindled to 308, down by 34.

In Australia, the firm has offices in Darwin, Perth, and Sydney. It has 23 partners in the country.


Related stories:
Squire Patton Boggs acts on flagship Perth development
Hall & Wilcox scores SPB employment partner and team

Recent articles & video

Pitched jury trial modifications to boost court timeliness

Supreme Court clarifies the application of 'longstop' limitation in the Building Act

New commercial manager comes into the ADR Centre

Auckland Airport’s $1.4bn equity raise takes off with boost from Russell McVeagh

2024 NZ Law Awards event partner on the crucial role of mid-size firms in the legal ecosystem

New sentencing reforms crack down on crime

Most Read Articles

Auckland Airport’s $1.4bn equity raise takes off with boost from Russell McVeagh

New District Court judges appointed to accident compensation appeal jurisdiction

Liar lawyer struck off for immigration-related misconduct

Supreme Court clarifies the application of 'longstop' limitation in the Building Act