Why angry workers may not necessarily quit

While negative emotions such as anger are more likely to be associated with workers storming out of the workplace and handing in their resignations, a new study by the Cambridge Judge Business School suggests that there is something more intricate at play.

Why angry workers may not necessarily quit
While negative emotions such as anger are more likely to be associated with workers storming out of the workplace and handing in their resignations, a new study by the Cambridge Judge Business School suggests that there is something more intricate at play.
 
“Theory and research on affect in organisations has mostly approached emotions from a valence perspective, suggesting that positive emotions lead to positive outcomes and negative emotions to negative outcomes…,” the study began.
 
The research, which was published in the Academy of Management Journal, found that work-related identifications have a major part in deciding whether an employee will quit or not regardless of their mood.
 
For instance, an angry worker who identifies with his company is less likely to quit. Instead, he will stick it out and try to improve his situation within the firm.
 
On the other hand, if a worker fails to identify with the company, emotions such as anger will be more likely to push them to leave.
 
The researchers went on to say that corporate policies which broadly characterise specific emotions could actually harm the organisation.
 
“The study suggests that company policies that are designed to promote positive emotions or minimise negative emotions may in fact not have the intended effect,” says Jochen Menges, university lecturer in organisational behaviour at Cambridge Judge Business School and professor of leadership at WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management in Germany.
 
“So rather than seeking to suppress certain workplace emotions, companies should instead adopt practices that seek to encourage greater organisational identification.”
 
The study examined 135 people employed in the US and Europe at the same company over a period of one year. During this time, each worker was asked about their intentions to remain with or leave the firm. They were also asked about both general and specific organisational issues such as scheduling, pay, satisfaction and culture.
 
Researchers then looked at staff turnover at the company six months after the final survey was done. They found a definite correlation between the amount of staff intending to leave and actual turnover.

Free newsletter

Subscribe to our FREE newsletter service and we’ll keep you up-to-date with the latest breaking news, cutting edge opinion, and expert analysis affecting both your business and the industry as whole.

Please enter your email address below and click on Sign Up for daily newsletters from Australasian Lawyer.

Recent articles & video

Holding Redlich boosts tax controversy practice with EY hire

Thomson Geer helps West Cobar Metals make ASX debut with $5.5m IPO

Ashurst unveils new inclusion, diversity, and belonging targets

Keypoint Law adds practice group head from national firm to Sydney office

SPB Sydney partner leads multijurisdictional team on €1.36bn PPP project

Mishcon seniors defect to Greenberg Traurig

Most Read Articles

Australia’s fastest-growing law firms revealed

Two ascend to partnership at White & Case Australia

ACT makes historic change to sexual consent law

Keypoint Law adds practice group head from national firm to Sydney office