NRF helps secure US$100m facility for massive offshore oil project

The facility will be used for Woodside’s $1.9bn Greater Enfield project

NRF helps secure US$100m facility for massive offshore oil project
Norton Rose Fulbright has advised on a US$100mn term loan and guarantee facility, which will be used by Woodside for its offshore operations in Western Australia.

The facility has export credit support provided by DNB Bank ASA and the Norwegian Export Credit Agencies (ECA). The facility is the first of its type between Woodside and the Norwegian export credit agencies.

NRF advised Eksportkreditt Norge AS as lender; DNB Bank ASA as agent and arranger, ECA co-ordinator and ECA guarantor; and Norway’s Guarantee Institute for Export Credits (GIEK) as ECA guarantor on the loan and guarantee facility.

The facility will be used to support the delivery of subsea equipment for installation on the seabed to support Woodside’s $1.9bn Greater Enfield project, an offshore oil project which will include up to 14 wells, according to projectconnect.com.au.  

Partner Dale Rayner and senior associate Grant Schulz in Brisbane, who led the Norton Rose Fulbright team, was assisted by associate Ben Bourke. Sydney partner Ellen Thomas advised on tax aspects.


Related stories:
NRF helps tech VC launch growth fund
Firms land on Heathrow third runway panel

Recent articles & video

Nick Brown: 'Legal advice is just one of several inputs to high-quality decision making'

HFW poaches group from JWS

Echo Law kicks off class action against Harvey Norman, Domayne and Joyce Mayne

Clayton Utz counsels Ardea on shareholders' agreement with Japanese consortium

Locke Lord, Troutman Pepper to merge with over 1,600 lawyers in US, Europe

Legal fee request of up to US$34.1 million denied in JetBlue-Spirit merger suit

Most Read Articles

Hogan Lovells to shut down Sydney office

81% of Australian law firms are getting phished: survey

MinterEllison lures KPMG Law national real estate head

Blockchain investor and lawyer files US$100-million malpractice suit against Covington & Burling