New York lawyer sues over private censure, gets publicly censured

The lawyer was privately censured for secretly recording a court hearing during his divorce

New York lawyer sues over private censure, gets publicly censured

A New York City lawyer sued over a private censure, only to eventually agree to be publicly censured.

David Evan Schorr was privately censured for secretly recording a court hearing during his divorce, the American Bar Association Journal said. He rejected the private censure, which prompted the New York Attorney Grievance Committee to re-open an investigation into him.

Schorr then sued the committee, alleging officials punished him by reopening the investigation.

The suit was tossed out by a federal judge. The decision was affirmed last year by the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals at New York, which said that the lawyer had failed to plausibly allege facts showing bad faith.

The Attorney Grievance Committee found that the lawyer violated an ethics rule that bars conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, based on the 2nd Circuit’s findings.

The committee and Schorr then jointly moved for the public censure.

Recent articles & video

Allens assists Seraya Partners with landmark acquisition of ASX lister

Law Council of Australia, ACT Bar call out underfunding in legal aid sector

NSW Law Soc, LexisNexis team up on AI Glossary

Report recommends US federal courts award monetary damages for workplace misconduct

Report highlights racial challenges faced by South Asian partners in the UK

Michael Best & Friedrich enters California market by absorbing Los Angeles law firm

Most Read Articles

Revealing the top influencers in Australia’s legal profession for 2024

HSF helps consortium wth Ulinda Park BESS project financing

Federal Court fines employer for failing to issue payslips

Lander & Rogers brings in digital economy practice head