Legal delivery centre “super depressing” say future lawyers

The creation of a legal delivery centre at one law school has been seen as a dismal sign of the times for graduates and their employment prospects.

Legal delivery centre “super depressing” say future lawyers
With the continual advancement of technology, the legal field is also changing, with tasks that used to be performed by young lawyers now being handled by computers.
These developments are especially affecting low-ranked institutions such as the Suffolk Law School in Boston where employment prospects for graduates have always been low.
In response, the school has transformed a little-used room in its library into a legal delivery centre where law students can work on tasks such as due diligence contract review, legal spend analytics projects and large-scale document review.
It is the latter which is of most importance since many Suffolk graduates end up as computer-assisted document reviewers – one of the many fields which benefit from but which don’t necessarily require a law degree.
The shift in focus to this area has been seen as “super depressing” by the school’s students since it is not only a shift away from the traditional legal role but also doesn’t pay as much either.
Suffolk Dean Andrew Perlman said that while there are fewer traditional jobs available at law firms, the graduates from his school weren’t filling those positions anyway.
“[More] and more of [Suffolk’s] graduates are taking positions at the intersection of law and technology, for which a legal degree is helpful but not necessary,” he said.
This includes positions in fields such as compliance or with firms specialising in legal technology.
The school has partnered with Integreon to run the legal delivery centre in what has been called a Client Services Innovation Program. Law students will receive training through this program and will be paid US$20 (NZ$30) an hour for their work.

Recent articles & video

US legaltech firm signs up seasoned vet for Australian debut

Federal Court rules registrar can reject ‘abuse of process, frivolous, and vexatious’ applications

Highlight: 2022 Most Influential Lawyer has an app on Microsoft’s AppSource

White & Case bolsters commercial litigation practice

Will more businesses implement pay transparency?

Employers pushing back against hybrid model

Most Read Articles

HSF wins landmark case for insurance company

New CEO steps up at KCL Law

Federal Court allows extension of time for compliance with statute despite counsel's error

G+T helps juice up Ausgrid with billion-dollar refinancing